NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:07:51 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1155 bytes) , text/html (1991 bytes)
I asked this question from George Sadowsky during the intersessional when
were talking about board members. George said it is in violation of the
ICANN bylaws if they represent specific interest I asked so why are we even
appointing them and I think the response was that they should not represent
the interest of their group when they vote. So,  I guess NCPH appointed
board members can  discuss the concerns of NCPH with other Board members if
they care enough. And only gods and spirits know  if she is representing
the interest of the group it has been appointed by.  I will look up the
transcript and see if I can find George's answer.

This question has to be formulated in a way that we don't get the same
answer as we got during the intersessional.


On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> If I know ICANN, they may revert to their old line that board members
> don't represent any specific interest group but must set all that aside and
> take a vow of allegiance to ICANN the corporation. However, if that's the
> case why have NCPH appoint its own board member? Might be interesting to
> see how they handle that...
>
> --MM
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2