All,
I wanted to confirm that our NCUC comments on the .TEL proposal were  timely 
submitted.  If you would like to see the comments, as well as a  terrific 
response to the Business Constituency, International Trademark  Association and IP 
Constituencies objections by the head of TELNIC, the comments  are posted at:
            _http://forum.icann.org/lists/telnic-whois-proposal/_ 
(http://forum.icann.org/lists/telnic-whois-proposal/) 
 
Best,
Kathy
p.s. I changed "Catch-22" to "no-win"
 
<<Milton L Mueller wrote: 


 
Thanks so much,  Kathy! Does anyone object to putting in these comments on 
behalf of  NCUC?

Thanks, Kathy, I fully support the  intent, but I have one small reservation 
on the text: I do not understand  "catch22" and I would appreciate to replace 
it with simple, generally  understandable language - understandable also by 
those who are weak in the  English language.

Norbert



 
  
____________________________________
 
From:  Non-Commercial User Constituency 
[_mailto:[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) ]  On Behalf Of [log in to unmask] 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) 
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 11:31  PM
To: [log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) 
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Draft comments  to support .TEL's Whois proposal - 
due  6/28


[snip]

-- 

If you want to know what is going on in Cambodia,

please visit us regularly - you can find something new every day:



_http://cambodiamirror.wordpress.com_ (http://cambodiamirror.wordpress.com/)  







************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.