LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show HTML Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: [cc-humanrights-research] [cc-humanrights] CCWP-HR Research: Call for volunteers (reply by 8th April) + Call Update
From:	Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:32:27 -0400
Content-Type:	multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (468 bytes) , text/html (921 bytes)

/Niels, //
//
//Well, as an empiricist I suggest we just let it flow and test the no 
confusion hypothesis. //
//
//Sam /

On 07/04/2016 12:51 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I don't think the word 'group' is claimed anywhere in ICANN, so I don't
> understand using the term 'subgroup' poses a problem or creates unclarity.
>
> The 'subgroup on PDPs' follows PDPs, so I also don't understand how that
> is an issue, similar to the 'subgroup on workstream 2'.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU