RIghto!


On 11 November 2013 16:22, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In my minds ear, i hear you asking it and it sounds great.
> though you do take a breath.
>
> avri
>
> On 11 Nov 2013, at 10:43, Maria Farrell wrote:
>
> > Avri hits all the topics I really hoped to see. I'd just add something
> along the lines of - given the difficulties NCSG has had having any
> positive impact on the policy process, and the findings in the Interconnect
> ATRT2 report that significant numbers of ppl in the GNSO have no faith in
> the process given the tendency of business interests to do end-runs around
> it, how can ICANN be leading the charge for the multistakeholder process
> externally? Shouldn't we get our own house in order first?
> >
> > And good luck to anyone who tries asking that 'question' in one breath...
> >
> > Maria
> >
> >
> > On 10 November 2013 17:37, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8 Nov 2013, at 20:27, Robin Gross wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I'm preparing agenda items for our various discussions at the upcoming
> ICANN Meeting #48 in Buenos Aires.
> > >
> > > So please let me know what agenda items you would like to speak to the
> ICANN Board of Directors about during our 1 hour meeting with them in BA.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Robin
> >
> >
> > Some possible questions:
> >
> > Q - details on the decisions they have made with regard to the NCSG case
> on TMCH+50 and the DIDP request
> >
> > Q - general question on why they don't realize how bad their policies
> and actions with regad to reconsideration etc are and why they don't do
> anything about to fix it.
> >
> > Q - what are they going to do with 100's of millions they are going to
> rake in from auctions.  Will the community be involved in deciding on what
>  Why not?
> >
> > Q - why haven't we, the community, been included in these original plans
> for Brazil, with a follow-up on implications arising  from 11 Nov
> anouncemtent on the BrazilThngy (assuming the announcement came out)
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
>
>