NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:44:15 -0400
Reply-To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
All,

A flash of ICANN Board sanity here. Great!  If my memory serves me 
right, there may be a second related step necessary on the insurance 
front. I believe it is correct to say that ICANN also imposes an 
insurance requirement on contracts between Registrars and Registries. 
Correct me if I am wrong but as I recall, African Registries have also 
complained that the nature of the insurance condition, as written in the 
contracts, is also very burdensome.

Am I right...or wrong?

Sam L.

On 01/10/2015 11:33 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Related to the discussion about developing economies and gTLD, ICANN 
> board just voted this resolution waiving the registrar insurance 
> requirement which represents a barrier in many developing countries 
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-waives-registrar-insurance-requirement-levels-playing-field-for-registrars-globally
>
> Rafik
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2