NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Baudouin SCHOMBE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Baudouin SCHOMBE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:49:57 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (7 kB)
Hi William,

I will reach Nairobi on 26/09 at 16.20
can you give me a location and program about those meetings. From airport I
will go directly.

SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN

*COORDONNATEUR DU CENTRE AFRICAIN D'ECHANGE CULTUREL (CAFEC)
 ACADEMIE DES TIC
*COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
*MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
*AT-LARGE MEMBER (ICANN)
*NCUC/GNSO MEMBER (ICANN)

Téléphone mobile:+243998983491
email                  : [log in to unmask]
skype                 : b.schombe
blog                    : http://akimambo.unblog.fr
Site Web             : www.ticafrica.net




2011/7/14 William Drake <[log in to unmask]>

> Hi
>
> There could be some interesting synergy possibilities between the IGF and
> the ICANNsphere this time, e.g. with the new gTLD & JAS issues taken up in
> the main sessions, the Katim-instigated initiatve on ICANN & developing
> countries percolating pre-Dakar, etc.  Maybe something could be done along
> the lines of the outreach event Alex organized for the Nairobi ICANN, albeit
> on a smaller scale, and/or drawing on the SF workshop format…?
>
> I'll be there from Friday 23 Sept. Meetings (GigaNet, APC, ISOC, the
> ministerial) start Monday 26th, IGF from the 27th.  If anyone else will be
> around Sat-Sun 24-25 and interested in making something happen, I'd be happy
> to join the effort.
>
> Best
>
> Bill
>
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
> > Carissimi,
> >
> > The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be
> > there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we
> > think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being there
> > -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process
> pre-Senegal?
> >
> > First of, we would need to know who will be there.
> >
> > []s fraternos
> >
> > --c.a.
> >
> > On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> >> Thank you both.
> >>
> >> I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i was
> >> glad to be able to read some of them in advance.
> >>
> >> Nicolas
> >>
> >> On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >>> KK:
> >>> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of
> >>> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it
> >>> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I
> >>> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. We
> >>> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would
> >>> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review.
> >>>
> >>> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference
> >>> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of view.
> >>> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it
> >>> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review,
> imho.
> >>>
> >>> --MM
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM
> >>>> To: Milton L Mueller; [log in to unmask]
> >>>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP
> >>>> Importance: High
> >>>>
> >>>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and
> procedural
> >>>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a bit
> >>>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in my
> >>>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically pedantic.
> >>>>
> >>>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have also
> >>>> uploaded it in a piratepad version (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V)
> for
> >>>> those who do use open source software.
> >>>>
> >>>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May I,
> >>>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than
> July
> >>>> 14, 2011.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> KK
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> >>>> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> >>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100
> >>>> To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-
> >>>> [log in to unmask]>"<NCSG-NCUC-
> >>>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> >>>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP
> >>>>
> >>>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the effort.
> It
> >>>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope others
> >>>> can finish it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Milton L. Mueller
> >>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet
> >>>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2