Sorry to jump into this late...
Of course, support for Avri

Regards,

Alex

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:28 AM, MEDA Shefqet <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Are we in a voting process?
>
> If yes   +1 for Avri.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> Shefqet MEDA
>
> Electronic and Postal Communications Authority
> Directorate of Technical Regulation
> Director
> email:  [log in to unmask]
> alter. email: [log in to unmask]
> mob: 0355 6720 26 388
> Str. Reshit Collaku, No-43
> Tirana
> Albania
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:06 AM, asare-sakyi george <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> My support for you Avri  and wishing you the best of luck.
>> .
>> Ing George Asare Sakyi
>> Managing Director
>> Mont Royal Technologies
>> Tel: 0203001647
>> email: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Sent:* Wed, April 27, 2011 11:15:17 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: Election for ICANN Board seat now going on
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While it might be nice if we did have elections for the Board where all
>> the members of the constituencies and stakeholders got to vote, at this
>> point it is only the council members in the Non Contracted Parties House who
>> vote.  Though who knows for future elections we could propose it - though it
>> might take a by-laws change.
>>
>> In the CSG, as I understand it, the chairs of the constituencies have
>> directed how their council members must vote.  Of course they have the
>> choice of obeying or not since it is a secret ballot.
>>
>> In the NCSG, the council members are all free to decide for themselves how
>> they will vote.
>>
>> My hope is that they will decide to vote for me.  And maybe the support
>> they see here will help them decide to do so.
>>
>> And of course it truly warms my heart to see your support.  I appreciate
>> it greatly.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>> On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:59, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, this was what I asked as well.
>> >
>> > --c.a.
>> >
>> > On 04/27/2011 06:48 PM, Dan Krimm wrote:
>> >> Sure, +1.
>> >>
>> >> Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a formal
>> >> process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of
>> support"?
>> >>
>> >> Dan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> >>> 1+ for Avri.
>> >>>
>> >>> -J
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -J
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --c.a.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> >>>>> Let me second that motion!
>> >>>>> In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the need
>> for
>> >>>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just referring
>> to
>> >>>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in ICANN's
>> >>>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is
>> >>>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one of our
>> >>>> own for Board seat 14.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --MM
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>
>