NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Baudouin SCHOMBE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Baudouin SCHOMBE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:50:45 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1290 bytes) , text/html (2614 bytes)
Effectivemment Avri, I think this option can not be excluded because
> voluntary movements are very active in the community and, more generally,
> with 80% of the rural and peri-urban areas without significant economic
> power.
> I support your warning on this point.
>
> SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
> COORDONNATEUR DU CENTRE AFRICAIN D'ECHANGE CULTUREL (CAFEC)
> COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
> MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
> NCUC/GNSO MEMBER (ICANN)
>
> Téléphone mobile: +243998983491/+243999334571
>                            +243811980914
> email:                   [log in to unmask]
> blog:                     http://akimambo.unblog.fr
> siège temporaire : Boulevard du 30 juin Immeuble   Royal, Entrée A,7e
> niveau.
>
>
> 2010/7/20 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Just checking.
>>
>> The contention by some on the VIWG has been that I am deluded when I argue
>> that the NCSG, especially some of its institutional members have no interest
>> in seeing Single Registrant TLD (.ngo for want of a better name) where the
>> names could be distributed internally, without use of a registrar, to
>> employees or members.
>>
>> Can anyone confirm my delusion?  Are their institutional members who think
>> this sort of thing should exist - even if their name in not a famous brand?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> a.
>>
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2