NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:03:17 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2467 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:47 PM, David Post <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  At 10:38 AM 4/26/2015, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>
> [SNIP]  SO:
> In the current configuration, PTI is not in the position to issue RFP,
> it's rather the parent (ICANN) that is in the position to issue RFP based
> on the recommendation of IRF team/possible escalation from CSC. The later
> which is not yet very clear. So PTI is basically entering the current shoes
> of ICANN and ICANN will be entering the shoes of NTIA post-transition
>
>
> And this may be a dumb question, but just to clarify ... if ICANN enters
> the shoes of NTIA (the current contract "Administrator"), and PTI enters
> the shoes of ICANN (the current "IANA Functions Operator"), I assume there
> will also be someone stepping into the shoes of VeriSign (the "Maintainer")
> that will have a contract with both ICANN and PTI - is that corect?
>

Yes that is correct. However it is not clear how the VeriSign "shoe
wearing" will look like as that particular aspect is out-of-scope for the
CWG;  NTIA indicated there is/will be another process to address that (its
not clear what that process will look like). The CWG proposal made it clear
that whenever that shoe changing needs to be done, it should be determined
by the multistakeholder community. Maintaining the current separation
between the maintainer and operator was proposed. The relationship between
the admin and the maintainer post transition is what is yet to be
determined.

Secondly i hope by ICANN you know it does not mean ICANN staff/board alone.
It meant the entire community including ICANN staff/board

Cheers!
PS: Member of the CWG-stewardship but speaking on my personal capacity

>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> *******************************
> David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America
> Foundation
> blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
> book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
> <http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0>
> music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic
> <http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic%A0> publications etc.  http://www.davidpost.com
>
> *******************************
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>[log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !


ATOM RSS1 RSS2