NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Feb 2012 10:31:56 +0000
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On 2/5/12, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I agree here with Avri. The guidebook has enough safeguards to prevent
> misuse of the names of any IGO, NGO or other organisations. If you start to
> make exceptions as part of a "policy" you end in a nowhere land. Each case -
> if one appears - can be handled individually and there a lot of instruments
> you can use to stop the misuse of an established and recognized IGO/NGO
> name.

+1

 With regard to IGOs, this wll become part of GACs responsibilities, to
> go through the list of applications and to raise concerns if a private
> corporation applies for a new gTLD like .itu.

It might even be the job of the Independent Objector under "Community
Objections" to object to something like .redcross or even .itu.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2