NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:05:30 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1040 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Having been involved in an intersessional I found it personally useful. 
But in terms overall outcomes, and given the time and expenses involved, 
I too think they are not needed.
We could just as easily draft a focused online intersessional agenda and 
time frame, and achieve better results at lower costs and with wider 
participation.

Lastly, I left the misspelling of intersessional in the Subject: line 
just to maintain the thread.
Intercessional is the wrong word here, it usually refers a prayer on 
behalf of someone else.
On second thought, on behalf of ICANN maybe it is the right word :-\.

Sam L.
>
> Planning these meetings seems to involve a lot more complexity, 
> coordination and debate these days compared to when we started.
>
> Indeed, this is one of the reasons why I am a conscientious objector 
> to the whole intersessional meeting.
>
> It is not needed, and we are wasting enormous amount of time and 
> energy and eventually money on this.
>
> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
>
> Professor, School of Public Policy
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2