Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:05:30 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Having been involved in an intersessional I found it personally useful.
But in terms overall outcomes, and given the time and expenses involved,
I too think they are not needed.
We could just as easily draft a focused online intersessional agenda and
time frame, and achieve better results at lower costs and with wider
participation.
Lastly, I left the misspelling of intersessional in the Subject: line
just to maintain the thread.
Intercessional is the wrong word here, it usually refers a prayer on
behalf of someone else.
On second thought, on behalf of ICANN maybe it is the right word :-\.
Sam L.
>
> Planning these meetings seems to involve a lot more complexity,
> coordination and debate these days compared to when we started.
>
> Indeed, this is one of the reasons why I am a conscientious objector
> to the whole intersessional meeting.
>
> It is not needed, and we are wasting enormous amount of time and
> energy and eventually money on this.
>
> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
>
> Professor, School of Public Policy
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
|
|
|