NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Mon, 13 May 2013 22:45:36 +0200
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
Hi,

Objections have been filed, and people have had to respond to them (or not as they chose), even if they weren't through the Initial Evaluation first.

Strictly speaking I don't think any ICC panels have been formed yet (not that I would know for sure), but I think of the process as having begun.

On the list of pending cases: http://www.iccwbo.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=19327354883

.AMAZON (Application ID: 1-1315-58086) ...................................................................................................... 22

.PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) .................................................................................................. 15
.PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) .................................................................................................. 26
.PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) ................................................................................................ 134

I think them calling it a pending case mens it is in the process.


avri



On 13 May 2013, at 22:05, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> Good point, Jorge, I think what Avri meant was that an objection to those strings had been lodged. Avri, can you clarify quickly? 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of Jorge Amodio
>> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 3:54 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] GAC comments - and a note on support for
>> diversity of views in our community
>> 
>> Forgive my ignorance or I may have missed something but I don't think that
>> there is any string from the first new gTLD batch in the "dispute resolution"
>> stage yet, afaik that comes after the evaluation results, isn't it ?
>> 
>> -Jorge
>> 
>> On May 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks:
>>> 
>>> The edited version of the draft is at:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d6GT0zqLjU6e7Js-TE2Gjlm_-
>> B5xvhE5CrRPZSV3oV4/edit
>>> 
>>> As a compromise to the few objections on the earlier drafts, the current
>> version states it does not take a position on the amazon and patagonia
>> applications.  (Remember we are not commenting on individual applications
>> in this stmt, we are commenting on GAC process).
>>> 
>>> The deadline for NCSG filing these comments is tomorrow so I will be filing
>> them in 24 hours unless there are any other strong objections.   Thanks to
>> Milton and others for all the redrafting and compromising to get a statement
>> we can submit as a group.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Robin
>>> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2