+1.  Conflict of interest needs to be more of a focus now.

Stephanie


On 2016-06-16 7:40, Carlos Raul Gutierrez wrote:
> Dear Avri,
>
> I think that all PTI staff should AT LEAST be at arms length form GDD, 
> as basic good corporate governance practice. I don´t understand how 
> GDD staff can be the DNS TLD market maker, the RAA/RRA compliance 
> officer (as newly announced), and staff the PTI, all at the same time, 
> without risk of getting into conflicts of interest at some point. But 
> maybe we are talking about a very easy "clerical role" and everything 
> is covered by the new ACCT framework. Maybe you can enlighten me here.
>
> Cheers
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter
> skype carlos.raulg
> +506 8837 7176
> ________
> Apartado 1571-1000
> COSTA RICA
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:32 PM, avri doria <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Would like to get the NCSG range of views on ICANN's
>     plan/rationale for
>     secondment of all PTI staff in perpetuity.
>
>     The position I have taken personally is:
>
>     - I accept that in the initial instance, in consideration of the
>     current
>     employees and of stability, it makes sense to second those IANA
>     employees that wish to the PTI.
>
>     - with the exception of the PTI managerPresident (if they happen to be
>     the same person) who I feel might have a conflict of interest in terms
>     of ICANN the employer and PTI the fiduciary responsibility. I
>     think that
>     from day 0, this executive level employee should be a PTI employee
>     reporting solely to the PTI board.
>
>     - i think that replacement staff should be employed by PTI and not
>     ICANN.  there is an issue with having two sort of employees, those
>     seconded from day 0 and new employees, but as long as staff are
>     treated
>     well and equitably this shouldn't be a problem.
>
>     The CWG proposal did not get into this, though I think many of us
>     thought at the time that PTI staff would be PTI employees as part
>     of the
>     separability formula.
>
>     avri
>
>
>
>     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     Subject:        [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations
>     Date:   Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:05:05 +0000
>     From:   Yuko Green <[log in to unmask]
>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>     To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]
>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
>
>
>     Dear members of the IOTF,
>
>
>
>     Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing
>     recommendations we
>     have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward
>     to hearing any feedback you may have.
>
>
>
>     Regards,
>
>
>
>     *Yuko Green*
>
>     Strategic Programs Manager
>
>     Global Domains Division
>
>     Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
>     Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693 <tel:%2B1%20310%20578%208693>
>
>     Mobile: +1 310 745 1517 <tel:%2B1%20310%20745%201517>
>
>     E-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>     <mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
>     www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org> <http://www.icann.org/>
>
>
>
>
>
>     ---
>     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>     https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>