On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> You will also find some discussion in the proposed registry contract
> section 2.9:
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-agreement-specs-clean-04oct09-en.pdf
>
> (BTW: I have been told that this is worth reviewing for lots of reasons -
> and that those among us who are contract savvy could find lots f things to
> comment on in this document)
>
>

Agree, there is a lot to be concerned about.  I wrote about Specification 6,
particularly requirements for implementing protocols that do not have wide
acceptance in the market, here:

http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2010/1/8/4421904.html





>
> a.
>
>