I too support Avri's statement.

Maria


On 5 September 2013 22:25, Ron Wickersham <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> +1
>
> agree with Avri's statements.
>
> -ron
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>  Hi
>>
>> The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June.  At
>> todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the
>> NPOC statement.
>>
>> What do people think about the following?
>>
>> I will ask the NCSG Policy  Committee to decide by  6 September whether
>> they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
>>
>> Please comment.
>> Any objections?
>> Any edits?
>>
>> -----
>>
>>
>> NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/**comments-gnso-review-15jul13/**
>> msg00003.html<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html>>
>> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
>>
>> The NCSG also support comments submitted by:
>>
>> - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/**comments-gnso-review-15jul13/**
>> msg00002.html<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
>> >
>> - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/**comments-gnso-review-15jul13/**
>> msg00001.html<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
>> >
>>
>> against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
>>
>> The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
>>
>> We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013,
>> the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any
>> further delay.
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> I can't take complete silence as consent.  silence only works as consent
>> when other people are being noisy.
>>
>> so please say something
>>
>> avri
>>
>>