If I understood the last meeting correctly, it interpretatively was made 

out to bear impact on whether or not the Board could decide on reserving 

in the SLD and/or in the second round as a matter of implementation of 

an already decided policy (vs a PDP).



Neither interpretive sides (although the side pushing for implementation 

was more vocal) had much justificatory clout going for them with regard 

the purported link with how to go on and the fact that both names were 

already reserved.



Nicolas



On 1/8/2012 10:50 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,

>

> BTW is it significant that the Red Cross and the IOC are already 

> listed as reserved for this round of TLDs?

>

>> 2.2.1.2.3 Strings Ineligible for Delegation

>> The following names are prohibited from delegation as

>

> table is on page 2.9

>

>

>

>> International Olympic Committee

>> OLYMPIC OLYMPIAD OLYMPIQUE

>> OLYMPIADE OLYMPISCH OLÍMPICO

>> OLIMPÍADA أوليمبياد أوليمبي

>> 奥林匹克 奥林匹亚 奧林匹克

>> 奧林匹亞 Ολυμπιακοί Ολυμπιάδα

>> 올림픽 올림피아드 Олимпийский

>> Олимпиада

>> 1BInternational Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement

>> REDCROSS REDCRESCENT REDCRYSTAL

>> REDLIONANDSUN MAGENDDAVIDADOM REDSTAROFDAVID

>> CROIXROUGE CROIX-ROUGE CROISSANTROUGE

>> CROISSANT-ROUGE CRISTALROUGE CRISTAL-ROUGE

>> מגן דוד אדום CRUZROJA MEDIALUNAROJA

>> CRISTALROJO Красный Крест Красный Полумесяц

>> Красный Кристалл لالهلا رمحألا رمحألا بيلصلا

>> ﺍلكﺭيستالة ﺍلحم ﺍﺭء ءارمحلا ةرولبلا 紅十字

>> 红十字 紅新月 红新月

>> 紅水晶 红水晶

>

> Or is this only about second level names, reserved list and future rounds.

>

> thanks

>

> avri

>

> On 8 Jan 2012, at 20:29, Joy Liddicoat wrote:

>

>> Hello all – this FYI. The meeting is a follow up to the previous one 

>> discussing how to implement the Board decision in relation to the IOC 

>> and Red Cross.

>> Kind regards

>> Joy Liddicoat

>