NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:12:32 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1389 bytes) , text/html (2469 bytes)
Hi again,

Just a gentle reminder that the deadline for submission during the reply period will be in two days. I hope to hear something before then, especially if anyone disagrees with the statement in any way.

If I don’t hear back from anyone, I don’t mind submitting the statement as an individual but would prefer not to. I understand that the study isn’t the easiest document to go through. :)

Thanks all.

Amr

On Nov 8, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
> 
> I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> For more on the study itself, check this link: https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/whois-pp-abuse-study-24sep13-en.htm
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> _______________________________________________
> Privacy mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/privacy



ATOM RSS1 RSS2