I agree that this should be done quietly at the breakfast.  I don't see 
any point in having a nasty public confrontation over this. It is not as 
though they have not heard an earful about it already.
I would like to ask them their thoughts on public interest.  And on 
limitations to the ICANN remit.
stephanie

On 2016-02-28 22:18, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
> For example, I want them to justify their action in the CCWG last week 
> where they ignored our timeline, process, Charter and pretty much 
> every procedural nicety to put us in crisis mode and threaten the 
> transition.
>
> MM: Your outrage is justified but what they did is history and nothing 
> productive will come out of us waving our fingers at them over this.
>
> If Markus is there I want him to justify, as our appointee, siding 
> with the Board on all votes that this mess created last Tuesday and 
> point blank ask him why we should reappoint someone so out of touch 
> with the NCSG (with one exception).
>
> MM: This might actually be useful. But there normally are quieter, 
> more private meetings between us and our GNSO-appointed board members 
> at a breakfast. Will that be happening again this meeting? I would 
> like to get Markus and Bruce in a room and ask them what the hell was 
> going on in the board during the CCWG process.
>
> I guess we could label that as questions bout the Board's relations 
> with the CCWG and intent regarding the transition.
>
> I'd be interested in their response to questions about retainment of 
> The Analysis Group and why the bottom up process seems to be under 
> threat by ICANN retaining more and more "experts".
>
> I guess that's two topics.
>
> Ed
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From*: "Tapani Tarvainen" <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> *Sent*: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:12 AM
> *To*: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject*: Questions to the Board?
>
> Dear all,
>
> One regular event at ICANN meetings is that we get to meet the Board,
> talk with them about and ask them whatever we want.
>
> The Board would, however, like to know in advance what we're going
> to ask them, so they could better prepare for it.
>
> If you have suggestions for topics for our meeting with the Board in
> Marrakech, please let me know as soon as possible (feel free to post
> to the list or me directly, as you prefer).
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>