HI,
I would be interested in hearing the Boardīs views on the risks that the
post-Montevideo/Bali process entails for ICANN. Sort of a quick informal
risks assessment exercise...I would be curious to hear whether they have
given some thoughts to it or they just react/act/support the CEO without
foreseeing potential problems...
Best,
Marie-laure
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Maria Farrell <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> RIghto!
>
>
> On 11 November 2013 16:22, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In my minds ear, i hear you asking it and it sounds great.
>> though you do take a breath.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 11 Nov 2013, at 10:43, Maria Farrell wrote:
>>
>> > Avri hits all the topics I really hoped to see. I'd just add something
>> along the lines of - given the difficulties NCSG has had having any
>> positive impact on the policy process, and the findings in the Interconnect
>> ATRT2 report that significant numbers of ppl in the GNSO have no faith in
>> the process given the tendency of business interests to do end-runs around
>> it, how can ICANN be leading the charge for the multistakeholder process
>> externally? Shouldn't we get our own house in order first?
>> >
>> > And good luck to anyone who tries asking that 'question' in one
>> breath...
>> >
>> > Maria
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10 November 2013 17:37, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 8 Nov 2013, at 20:27, Robin Gross wrote:
>> >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > I'm preparing agenda items for our various discussions at the
>> upcoming ICANN Meeting #48 in Buenos Aires.
>> > >
>> > > So please let me know what agenda items you would like to speak to
>> the ICANN Board of Directors about during our 1 hour meeting with them in
>> BA.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Robin
>> >
>> >
>> > Some possible questions:
>> >
>> > Q - details on the decisions they have made with regard to the NCSG
>> case on TMCH+50 and the DIDP request
>> >
>> > Q - general question on why they don't realize how bad their policies
>> and actions with regad to reconsideration etc are and why they don't do
>> anything about to fix it.
>> >
>> > Q - what are they going to do with 100's of millions they are going to
>> rake in from auctions. Will the community be involved in deciding on what
>> Why not?
>> >
>> > Q - why haven't we, the community, been included in these original
>> plans for Brazil, with a follow-up on implications arising from 11 Nov
>> anouncemtent on the BrazilThngy (assuming the announcement came out)
>> >
>> > avri
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
|
