Hi Carlos,

If needed, yes, the NCSG Policy Committee will run a vote to decide.

All the best, Maria


On 26 June 2014 08:19, Carlos Raúl G. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Shouldn't we do a more or less formal ballot?
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8335 2487
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>
> El 26/06/2014, a las 08:13, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> escribió:
>
> Hi
>
> On Jun 25, 2014, at 11:55 PM, Sonigitu Ekpe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> Sam has withdrawn,
>
>
> Which is a pity
>
> yet to hear from Milton.
>
>
> I’m going to guess he’s interested
>
>
> I nominate William Drake as one with vibrancy to stand the criteria.
>
>
> Thanks for the thought but there is no way I can take on another labor
> intensive volunteer job at this time.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Lori Schulman <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>>   As to Avri’s point, I agree that this is about NCSG and not
>> constituencies
>>
> 100% agreement---as with the Council, we need to avoid viewing SG
> representation as an inter-constituency squabble over positional goods.  At
> this level things should be shared, including the workload.
>
> but it also should be about fairness and I didn’t even see the email that
>> said we were running a ballot today.
>>
> People were simply expressing support, it’s not a ballot.
>
> Best,
>
> Bill
>
>
>