Dear Milton,
Thanks for your comments. I have taken off the FCFS section and made it a comment for anyone who disagrees with this change.
Some other comments that require a rewrite I have not resolved - I would ask you to edit the document directly as that would be most accurate.
Thanks,
Vidushi
----- On Sep 19, 2016, at 6:41 PM, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I hope this is not the final version, it contain some sections that don't make
> sense and need to be modified.
> I have added some comments in the Google doc. In particular, I think we need to
> delete altogether what is now section c), and probably also section d).
> Neither of them make coherent points and they espouse positions which do not
> have consensus support i n NCSG
> From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Vidushi Marda
> <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 3:32:06 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [Deadline for comments 9/9] Re: pre-warning draft comment to gTLD
> subsequent procedure WG
> Dear All,
> Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures
> WG:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#.
> All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee
> can pick this up now.
> Best wishes,
> Vidushi
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 11:06:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [Deadline for comments 9/9] Re: pre-warning draft comment to gTLD
> subsequent procedure WG
> Dear All,
> Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures
> WG:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#.
> All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee
> can pick this up now.
> Best wishes,
> Vidushi
> ----- On Sep 6, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Vidushi Marda <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I think the idea of deadlines for comments work well. Thanks for the suggestion
>> Farzi.
>> Can we make the last day for comments/feedback on the doc this Friday the 9th?
>> That way we should be able to send in the doc by next week after incorporating
>> them.
>> Best,
>> Vidushi
>> ----- On Sep 5, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Michael Oghia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> +1 Farzi
>>> -Michael
>>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii < [log in to unmask] >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Thank you Vidushi and Niels,
>>>> I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual policies
>>>> you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to resolve the
>>>> comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment, then resolve
>>>> those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This is what we did in
>>>> the past and worked out well.
>>>> Best
>>>> Farzaneh
>>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina < [log in to unmask] >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Niels and all,
>>>>> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further
>>>>> work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it
>>>>> is.
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Tatiana
>>>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever < [log in to unmask] >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people,
>>>>>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up?
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Niels
>>>>>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote:
>>>>>> > Dear All,
>>>>>>> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this
>>>>>>> link:
>>>>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific
>>>>>>> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over
>>>>>> > arching human rights concerns.
>>>>>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments.
>>>>>> > Best,
>>>>>> > Vidushi
>>>>>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>>>>> >> Hi Niels,
>>>>>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did
>>>>>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working
>>>>>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind
>>>>>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG
>>>>>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment --
>>>>>> >> even a little late!
>>>>>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer
>>>>>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for
>>>>>> >> comment would enable more people to participate.
>>>>>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR,
>>>>>> >> Kathy
>>>>>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>>>>> >>> Dear all,
>>>>>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive
>>>>>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the
>>>>>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority
>>>>>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from
>>>>>> >>> the global south, etc).
>>>>>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is
>>>>>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be
>>>>>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet.
>>>>>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the
>>>>>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0].
>>>>>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on
>>>>>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to
>>>>>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so
>>>>>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :)
>>>>>> >>> All the best,
>>>>>> >>> Niels
>>>>>> >>> [0]
>>>>>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Niels ten Oever
>>>>>> Head of Digital
>>>>>> Article 19
>>>>>> www.article19.org
>>>>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>>>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>>>> --
>>>> Farzaneh
|
