Hi Vidushi,

Excellent work, thank you again for doing all of this ! Michael and I both
left some comments. But it is mostly in phrasing and not in content.

Best,

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Vidushi Marda <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at
> this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-
> KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific
> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses
> over arching human rights concerns.
>
> I look forward to your feedback and comments.
>
> Best,
>
> Vidushi
>
> ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask]
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Niels,
> >
> > I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did
> > not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working
> > Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind
> > enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG
> > participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment --
> > even a little late!
> >
> > But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer
> > vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for
> > comment would enable more people to participate.
> >
> > Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR,
> >
> > Kathy
> >
> >
> > On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive
> >> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the
> >> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority
> >> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from
> >> the global south, etc).
> >>
> >> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is
> >> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be
> >> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet.
> >>
> >> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the
> >> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document
> [0].
> >>
> >> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on
> >> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to
> >> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so
> >> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :)
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >>
> >> Niels
> >>
> >> [0]
> >> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/
> 4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=
> 1467180138000&api=v2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>



-- 
Corinne J.N. Cath