Here's my vote for support, even if not for an actual vote!

Caroline

---------------
Frenchparents.net - Bilingual online community in San Francisco
http://www.frenchparents.net

InternationalParents -
Le premier réseau international des familles futées
The first international network for smart parents
http://www.internationalparents.net/


Le 28 avr. 11 à 09:40, Alex Gakuru a écrit :

> Sorry to jump into this late...
> Of course, support for Avri
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:28 AM, MEDA Shefqet  
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Are we in a voting process?
>
> If yes   +1 for Avri.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> Shefqet MEDA
>
> Electronic and Postal Communications Authority
> Directorate of Technical Regulation
> Director
> email:  [log in to unmask]
> alter. email: [log in to unmask]
> mob: 0355 6720 26 388
> Str. Reshit Collaku, No-43
> Tirana
> Albania
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:06 AM, asare-sakyi george  
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> My support for you Avri  and wishing you the best of luck.
> .
> Ing George Asare Sakyi
> Managing Director
> Mont Royal Technologies
> Tel: 0203001647
> email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 11:15:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Election for ICANN Board seat now going on
>
> Hi,
>
> While it might be nice if we did have elections for the Board where  
> all the members of the constituencies and stakeholders got to vote,  
> at this point it is only the council members in the Non Contracted  
> Parties House who vote.  Though who knows for future elections we  
> could propose it - though it might take a by-laws change.
>
> In the CSG, as I understand it, the chairs of the constituencies  
> have directed how their council members must vote.  Of course they  
> have the choice of obeying or not since it is a secret ballot.
>
> In the NCSG, the council members are all free to decide for  
> themselves how they will vote.
>
> My hope is that they will decide to vote for me.  And maybe the  
> support they see here will help them decide to do so.
>
> And of course it truly warms my heart to see your support.  I  
> appreciate it greatly.
>
> Thanks
>
> a.
>
>
> On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:59, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
> > Yes, this was what I asked as well.
> >
> > --c.a.
> >
> > On 04/27/2011 06:48 PM, Dan Krimm wrote:
> >> Sure, +1.
> >>
> >> Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a  
> formal
> >> process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of  
> support"?
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> >>> 1+ for Avri.
> >>>
> >>> -J
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -J
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]>  
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --c.a.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> Let me second that motion!
> >>>>> In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the  
> need for
> >>>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just  
> referring to
> >>>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in  
> ICANN's
> >>>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is
> >>>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one  
> of our
> >>>> own for Board seat 14.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --MM
> >>>
> >>
>
>