Bruce, according to the CCWG charter, any determination by the board that a CCWG recommendation is “not in the public interest” requires a 2/3 majority of the board. Your comments contain 2 or 3 items which the board deems not in the “public interest.” Yet, as far as I can tell, no record of a vote is available. In order to verify that the board has actually passed its threshold, please provide a tally of the voting board members on each of those 3 items:



1.       Inspection rights



2.       Mission statement



3.       Human rights



Thanks,



--MM



From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin

Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 5:49 AM

To: Accountability Cross Community

Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations



Hello Jordan,



Thanks for posting to the list.



The comments are also available in the public comment forum at:



http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00011.html



We had a half day meeting of the full Board on Thursday 10 Dec, and then spent a few hours again with the full Board finalizing the comments yesterday – Sunday 13 Dec.      That was in addition to another half day meeting held on Saturday 5 Dec.   All dates are relative to my time zone ☺



Regards,

Bruce Tonkin