NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nuno Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nuno Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:03:16 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1505 bytes) , text/html (2311 bytes)
I am very concerned about the notion of having yet another race to TLDs...

On one hand, I agree with Avri, things should be as open and free as
possible. But, on the other side, one should never poke the tiger with a
short stick(*), meaning, we may be wakening a beast that we have not yet
learned how to control.

Best regards from Portugal,

Nuno

(*) in Brazil they have the saying "cutucar a onça com pau curto" which I
translated to the above expression, although a tiger is not a "onça".

2010/3/17 "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
[log in to unmask]>

> FYI have a look into the letter from the Vatican in its capacity as GAC
> member to the ICANN CEO.
> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/polvani-to-twomey-20feb09.pdf
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: Non-Commercial User Constituency im Auftrag von Marc Perkel
> Gesendet: Mi 17.03.2010 17:14
> An: [log in to unmask]
> Betreff: Re: Interesting challenge - .reality
>
>
> Wonder who will get the .god TLD?
>
> Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
>        the domain name was supposed to be the way for heaven for some
> people , but with trademark issues is becoming a hell :)
>
>        Rafik
>
>
>        2010/3/18 Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>                How would this be evaluated? I'm the owner of the Church of
> Reality and I have a trademark on the word "reality" itself. (In the
> religious and spiritual counseling class) - So - if (when) I apply for
> .reaity - what would be the process of evaluating that?
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2