Thanks Seun....I am betting insurance companies and the govt are going
to get you to connect your vehicle, wont be an option. I realize this
is somewhat outside the ambit of this group. I asked the question at a
security meeting in Singapore and got the "you just dont get it lady"
brush off...but a friend said later that indeed there was a question
(beyond the obvious security issues with these networked objects) of how
devices were going to be addresssed. And it is certainly a human rights
question if we auction off the domains for networked devices to a
monopoly provider and prevent individuals from having any control,
although as a haggard old privacy advocate I can certainly attest to the
truth of what Timothy just posted. People on the whole are not
able/eager to assert control.
So while I try to stay out of watching the new gTLD auctions, plate
already being overloaded, does anyone know if this is happening yet?
cheers SP
On 2015-03-27 4:28, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> Replying to your question (re: who owns domain of your car), first I
> like to say there is practically no way your Honda will be accessible
> by domain without the domain being added in the first place so you
> will be making an informed decision by adding the domain. However if
> there arise a technology that hard-codes domain on your Honda, you
> will also need to make decision to connect device on the network with
> an IP address before the domain can be reachable publicly.
> So the question would be, how informed will users be by then. I don't
> really think domain registration would be a big concern by then.
>
> Cheers!
>
> sent from Google nexus 4
> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>
> On 27 Mar 2015 06:47, "Stephanie Perrin"
> <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> I certainly am. I am curious to know whether domains are going to
> be involved, and if so who will register them (i.e. will Steph's
> Honda, and all the tattle tale devices in it be accessible on a
> domain, and if so who owns the domain....Honda, my insurance
> company, the device companies, the apps, or me???)
> SP
>
> On 2015-03-27 0:37, James Gannon wrote:
>
> I do some work and research in this area, if someone reminds
> me next week after Im back from the CWG F2F i can do up some
> info on this for the group if anyone is interested?
>
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 02:59, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Stephanie,
>
> This has been on the agenda and worried about for some
> time. The "connected-car" is but one data source in the
> Internet of Things (IoT). Everything written in this piece
> will apply to your IoT stove, frig, children's coat,
> garage door, furnace, light switch....you name it. One
> approach is to say all data is privately owned and that
> the data miners have to negotiate for what they have
> access to within the privately owned data.
>
> Sam L.
>
>
> On 26/03/2015 4:59 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> Folks interested in privacy may find this report on
> the connected car interesting, if alarming. The
> report was written by Philippa Lawson, a well known
> Canadian privacy lawyer who was for several years
> heading up CIPPIC in Ottawa. This privacy research
> was funded under the Canadian Privacy Commissioner's
> grants and contributions program.
> https://fipa.bc.ca/connected-car/
> Stephanie Perrin
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------
> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
> in an unjust state" -Confucius
> ------------------------------------------------
> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
> email: [log in to unmask] Skype: slanfranco
> blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
> Phone: +1 613-476-0429 <tel:%2B1%20613-476-0429> cell: +1
> 416-816-2852 <tel:%2B1%20416-816-2852>
>
|
