or perhaps call for an open group so that anyone can join?



On 24 June 2016 at 08:01, Dorothy K. Gordon <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> In theory your approach would be ideal but given the deadlines would it be
> effectively possible? Perhaps Council + a few others?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Gannon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 6:12:30 AM
> Subject: Council Item for Disussion
>
>
> Hi All,
> As we know there are many changes coming for the role of the GNSO with our
> new accountability powers, I want to call out the following item on the
> council agenda for Helsinki
>
>     * Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Approval to Form a Drafting Team to Develop
> an Implementation Plan for New and Additional GNSO Powers and Obligations
> under the Revised ICANN Bylaws (15 minutes)
>
> I have to say that I am concerned about this, this is a critical item for
> the GNSO and will set its strategic view and position for the next 5-7
> years most likely, I don’t fee very comfortable with this being done in a
> potentially top down manner by council, I feel that this should be
> developed in a bottom up manner by the SGs and C’s first.
>
>
> I would be interested in others thoughts so that we can guide the PC on a
> position on this
>
>
>
>
> James
>



-- 
Farzaneh