NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:58:29 +0800
Reply-To:
"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Carlos Afonso wrote:

> Not at all -- first of all, I never mentioned a time frame, much less a long 
> time. Secondly, why a working group would take forever? To the contrary, I 
> think a study by people who are following the issue could be done in 3-4

   Then the mandate for the WG should be clear on the timeframe. Otherwise,
the BC will just spin this into going forever.

> What is the point in NCUC playing into the game of "yes to this domain, not 
> to that one", if there are just too many possibilities and criteria circling 
> around without any consistency?

   Precisely what Milton was suggesting. We point out that we really have 
no objections to those particular domains but the process of approval must 
be clarified.


-- Bombim Cadiz
*****************************************
*  Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) --  *
* No windows. No gates. It is open.     *
* No Bill. It is Free.                  *
*****************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2