On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Carlos Afonso wrote:

> Not at all -- first of all, I never mentioned a time frame, much less a long 
> time. Secondly, why a working group would take forever? To the contrary, I 
> think a study by people who are following the issue could be done in 3-4

   Then the mandate for the WG should be clear on the timeframe. Otherwise,
the BC will just spin this into going forever.

> What is the point in NCUC playing into the game of "yes to this domain, not 
> to that one", if there are just too many possibilities and criteria circling 
> around without any consistency?

   Precisely what Milton was suggesting. We point out that we really have 
no objections to those particular domains but the process of approval must 
be clarified.


-- Bombim Cadiz
*****************************************
*  Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) --  *
* No windows. No gates. It is open.     *
* No Bill. It is Free.                  *
*****************************************