+1

Sincerely,

Walid

-----------------

Walid Al-Saqaf


On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:32 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> fine by me, thank Avri.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June.  At
> todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the
> NPOC statement.
> >
> > What do people think about the following?
> >
> > I will ask the NCSG Policy  Committee to decide by  6 September whether
> they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
> >
> > Please comment.
> > Any objections?
> > Any edits?
> >
> > -----
> >
> >
> > NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html>
> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
> >
> > The NCSG also support comments submitted by:
> >
> > - ISPCP <
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
> > - Google <
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
> >
> > against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
> >
> > The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
> >
> > We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013,
> the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any
> further delay.
> >
> >
> > -----
> >
> > I can't take complete silence as consent.  silence only works as consent
> when other people are being noisy.
> >
> > so please say something
> >
> > avri
>