Perhaps NCSG should make an official public statement to express our  
concern regarding the mis-handling of this issue by the GNSO Council  
(and possibly staff due to their shepherding of the motion through  
regardless of proper process)?  I think we need to draw attention to  
these problems where councilors are creating such privileges for  
their own clients with their council votes and also resubmitting a  
rejected motion without dealing with the conflict of interest causing  
the problem in the first place.

Thanks,
Robin

On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> On 20 Dec 2012, at 14:22, joy wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Thanks all for the comments. The matter was referred to the SCI  
>> today,
>> following the Council meeting.
>> Joy
>
>
> It may have been referred to the SCI,
> but that is a case too late.
>
> the motion that both staff and the chair wanted passed was rammed  
> through.
> in my opinion this was illegitimate.
> and should have waited on the recommendation of the SCI.
>
> avri
>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]