NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tomslin Samme-Nlar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tomslin Samme-Nlar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Nov 2023 16:06:13 +1100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2931 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Thanks, Julf.
That would be very helpful for the PC to be able to objectively select from
those whove expressed interest.

@Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele <[log in to unmask]>  @John Gbadamosi
<[log in to unmask]>  @Bruna Martins dos Santos
<[log in to unmask]>  @[log in to unmask] can you provide a
description of your familiarity with Organizational Reviews and knowledge
of continuous improvement work either within or outside of ICANN?

Warmly,
Tomslin

On Sat, 4 Nov 2023, 00:17 Johan Helsingius, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I would suggest volunteers / candidates describe their familiarity with
> Organizational Reviews and knowledge of continuous improvement work
> outside of ICANN.
>
>         Julf
>
>
> On 02/11/2023 20:28, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> > Dear members,
> >
> > The Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group
> > (CIP-CCG) terms of reference calls for each SO, AC, GNSO Stakeholder
> > Group, and Regional At-Large Organization (RALO) to appoint one (1)
> > representative to the Group.
> >
> > Regarding the representative, the ToR recommends the following
> > skill/expertise:
> >
> > "*It will be useful to have some representatives with familiarity with
> > Organizational Reviews, but also representatives with knowledge of
> > continuous improvement work outside of ICANN; those that can contribute
> > new and innovative ideas for improving the effectiveness and the
> > accountability of the different ICANN structures*."
> > If anyone would like to volunteer, please let me know by Tuesday 7th
> > November for the PC to evaluate.
> >
> > _*More info on CIP-CCG:*_
> >
> > The Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) Recommendation
> > 3.6 calls for Organizational Reviews to be evolved into a Continuous
> > Improvement Program (CIP). The recommendation to create a Continuous
> > Improvement Program states that ICANN org shall work with each
> > Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC) and their
> > stakeholder groups, and the Nominating Committee (NomCom) to establish a
> > Continuous Improvement Program. It will include an annual satisfaction
> > survey of members/participants, and a regular assessment, including a
> > summary of continuous improvements published at least every three years.
> >
> > As the ICANN Community considers the implementation of ATRT3
> > Recommendation 3.6 as it relates to each community structure and for the
> > ICANN Community overall, the CIP Community Coordination Group is
> > intended to serve as a forum to exchange best practices, lessons
> > learned, as well as for sharing information and progress related to
> > already existing community continuous improvement activities. The
> > representatives in the CIP-CCG will share best practices and collaborate
> > on community-wide implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6, while
> > relaying information back to their constituencies to inform the process
> > and voice decisions.
> >
> > Warmly,
> > Tomslin
> >
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2