Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:58:17 -0400 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree, designating a volunteer who is responsible for the process for
various exercises is a great idea. The Chair has a ton of processes to
manage, and the PC structure and procedures seems to me (as a member)
could use a little brainstorming.
Kind regards.
Stephanie
On 2014-08-30, 8:16, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> We can consider this a well-intended judgement call on the part of the
> Chair, but it did compromised the integrity of process within NCSG. I
> can understand the pressure of the time deadline and there is little
> to gain from being harsh here, but we should learn from this episode.
>
> ........
> Again, the main lesson here should be that in the heat of the
> preliminary discussions NCSG should designate someone (a volunteer) to
> act as the drafting person to formulate possible text in case NCSG
> decides to make a submission, and to maintain communication links with
> other constituencies for collaborative action. That would have been
> easy to do in this instance.
>
> Sam L.
|
|
|