Dear All,
Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#. All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee can pick this up now.
Best wishes,
Vidushi
----- On Sep 6, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Vidushi Marda <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear All,
> I think the idea of deadlines for comments work well. Thanks for the suggestion
> Farzi.
> Can we make the last day for comments/feedback on the doc this Friday the 9th?
> That way we should be able to send in the doc by next week after incorporating
> them.
> Best,
> Vidushi
> ----- On Sep 5, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Michael Oghia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> +1 Farzi
>> -Michael
>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii < [log in to unmask] >
>> wrote:
>>> Thank you Vidushi and Niels,
>>> I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual policies
>>> you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to resolve the
>>> comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment, then resolve
>>> those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This is what we did in
>>> the past and worked out well.
>>> Best
>>> Farzaneh
>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina < [log in to unmask] >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Niels and all,
>>>> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further
>>>> work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it
>>>> is.
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Tatiana
>>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever < [log in to unmask] >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people,
>>>>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up?
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Niels
>>>>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote:
>>>>> > Dear All,
>>>>>> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this
>>>>>> link:
>>>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific
>>>>>> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over
>>>>> > arching human rights concerns.
>>>>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments.
>>>>> > Best,
>>>>> > Vidushi
>>>>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>>>> >> Hi Niels,
>>>>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did
>>>>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working
>>>>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind
>>>>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG
>>>>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment --
>>>>> >> even a little late!
>>>>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer
>>>>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for
>>>>> >> comment would enable more people to participate.
>>>>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR,
>>>>> >> Kathy
>>>>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>>>> >>> Dear all,
>>>>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive
>>>>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the
>>>>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority
>>>>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from
>>>>> >>> the global south, etc).
>>>>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is
>>>>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be
>>>>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet.
>>>>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the
>>>>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0].
>>>>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on
>>>>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to
>>>>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so
>>>>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :)
>>>>> >>> All the best,
>>>>> >>> Niels
>>>>> >>> [0]
>>>>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2
>>>>> --
>>>>> Niels ten Oever
>>>>> Head of Digital
>>>>> Article 19
>>>>> www.article19.org
>>>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>>> --
>>> Farzaneh
|