What about a broad message of support to the nomcom about how we're happy
with moves taken & will watch closely and with interest?

(and then actually watch, closely and with interest..?)

Message could be quite short and sweet - happy to draft/assist.

Maria

On 26 October 2012 03:19, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 25 Oct 2012, at 21:43, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> > @Avri thanks for your comment, can you please explain what you mean by
> issues of process discussion in more detail?
> >
> >
>
>
> e.g.
>
> "
> 5. established clear distinctions between ‘transparency’ and
> ‘confidentiality
> "
>
> what are those clear distinctions?
>
> "
> 8. did an in-depth review of the Statement of Interest form (SOI) to
> improve clarity for candidates and to enhance and enable the output of the
> Committee;
> "
>
> what did that review find. what is being done to improve clarity for
> candidates
>
> "
> reviews of the 2013 NomCom Rules and Procedures; confidentiality
> requirements; Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest parameters
> "
>
> Sounds enchanting.  what did these reviews uncover.  What conclusions were
> reached.
>
> What this report does is shows us the covers of the chapter headings, but
> not the contents.  None of this stuff concerns private data, hence it seems
> to be stuff that should be explained in greater detail.
>
> So while I am grateful for the start, it is a first that should be
> congratulated, it is only a start.
>
> thanks for asking
>
> avri
>