NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:06:38 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2757 bytes) , text/html (6 kB)
fik

I am in the process of having the first page for the Friday outreach changed event http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/fri-civil-society and I just had the NCUC CD day page changed http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/tue-ncuc, but as you like.

BD 

On Jun 7, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> 
> we cannot  ask for change the first page as I was told by GNSO secretariat and for the second as I told you I have the permissions to edit it .
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 2014-06-07 19:42 GMT+09:00 William Drake <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hi Rafik
> 
> I meant the link on the schedule page  http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/tue-ncsg that goes to our Confluence page https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/NCSG+London+Meeting+2014-06-24
> 
> cheers
> 
> BD
> 
> On Jun 7, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bill,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The paper (and any other inputs members devise) can of course be used as a backgrounder to our privacy session, and we could ask staff change the Confluence link to say Workshop Agenda and Background Paper(s) so it’s widely accessible anyway.
>> 
>> 
>> we don't need staff support for this, I have the permissions to edit in that page. it should be populated soon.
>> 
>> Rafik
>>  
>> 
>> On Jun 7, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Stephanie,
>>> 
>>> thank you for all efforts and I acknowledge the difficulty to participate in the EWG where it is not easy to defend privacy unfortunately. your participation probably helped to prevent more worse outcome. 
>>> 
>>> we need to respond to the report and so volunteers to do so( we have also to respond to the Whois and local laws too!)
>>> we have many things to discuss in London in this regard.
>>> can you please share your dissenting report if possible?
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Rafik 
>>> 
>>> 2014-06-07 10:13 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>:
>>> The EWG report is out.  I wrote a dissenting report, but they would not publish it.  I will give a prize to the persons who find what I am complaining about (Tamir, Milton, and Kathy, you don't count!)
>>> Thanks to all who have helped and encouraged me during this long and lonely year. 
>>> Stephanie
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I am very pleased to inform you that the EWG Final Report is now posted-  see: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf.  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> It will appear shortly on the ICANN homepage and will be part of a blog  on Monday.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2