Jorge,

You're very welcome, I'm glad it worked out for you, and thanks for the
feedback.   I'm going to forward your comment on to folks I work with at the
Internet Governance Project that deal with Elluminate (and know far more
about it than I do). I'm sure something can be done to improve the audio
if/when that tool is used.


Best,

Brenden


On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> First of all, big thanks for the extra effort to enable remote
> participation, and
> particularly to Brenden that was very helpful letting us keep track of what
> was going on in the room and who was speaking.
>
> On this side didn't have any major issues with the Elluminate application
> but for some reason the quality of the audio was not comparable to the
> experience with Acrobat Connect or the Audiocast the ALAC folks are
> using.
>
> There was a high level of ambient noise and obviously it was more easy to
> hear those that were close to the microphone, so thanks for asking several
> times for people to remember to use it.
>
> Some voices were easy to recognize, Robin, Avri, Debra, and Milton
> (may be because they are the more noisy ones :-), for following meetings
> I guess it could be a good practice, at least during the first hour or two
> of the meeting, to say your names before you speak so we can train
> our ears to recognize the voices.
>
> To be frank there was some portions of the meeting I was not able to
> follow, but I'd say I've got 70-80-% of the discussions/presentations.
>
> There is one subject for which I provided some comments via chat
> regarding how to build better relationships with other constituencies
> particularly with ALAC, but I'll spare this topic for a separate email.
>
> Hope you all had a great time at the gala, I've seen few pictures and
> the setup looked impressive.
>
> Getting ready now for the start of another interesting remote participation
> day at ICANN 36.
>
> Thanks again & Regards
> Jorge
>
>