NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Norbert Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Norbert Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:16:51 +0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (897 bytes) , text/html (1282 bytes)
+1

"...At this point,... making sure voters understand their options and 
how the votes will be treated is just confusing..."

Yes it is.

Norbert

=


On 8/25/2016 8:14 PM, avri doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think after this election is done it will be interesting to actually
> develop a realistic model that takes into account the numbers and
> distribution of members across all 3 voting types, a realistic model
> that we can then test various scenarios, including the current no other
> that's acceptable - NOTA - bar setting indicator and other models that
> people want to propose. We can then use the model to understand and
> explore the hypothetical edge cases that people are putting forward in a
> fact based manner.
>
> At this point, going beyond the simple application of the current model
> and*making sure voters understand their options and how the votes will be 
> treated is just confusing*.
>
> thanks
>
> avri
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2