NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tatiana Tropina <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tatiana Tropina <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:40:05 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (8 kB)
Dear all,
I am the one 4 candidates who applied by sending an email directly to
Tapani, as his email suggested to let *him* know as soon as possible so I
thought volunteering off-list is fine. I also wanted to avoid long threads
of plus 1s, as it usually happens. Sorry for any confusion - I answered to
Tapani directly that I can volunteer right after he sent the initial email
to the list, and I couldn't foresee how this would develop.
Warm regards
Tatiana Tropina

On 19 February 2017 at 16:35, avri <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Not at all your fault. I think some were sent to Tapani directly as his
> original note suggested. It was probably me who first erred by sending it
> to the list - though in fairness to me, he had suggested in conversation
> that this is what I should do.
>
> Avri
>
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Nadira Alaraj <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2/19/17 15:14 (GMT+00:00)
> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Call for volunteers: alternate councillor
>
> ​​Thanks Avri, for bringing my attention to the 4 candidates, having >20
> emails and +1 emails, sure made me skip some emails.
> I apologize for the candidates, whom I missed their emails.
>
> ​​
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:04 PM, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I very much appreciate the support I have gotten. and hope I will be
>> chosen for more council service.
>>
>> However, I would like to point out that there are currently 4 candidates
>> as far as I know and the call is still open for several more days.
>>
>> As far as process, we sort of do have one, the NCSG EC, once all
>> candidates are in at the end of the week's call. (I think Tapani gave a
>> week) decides what to do. They have the full range of freedom given by the
>> GNSO operating procedures.
>>
>> While we could define more detailed processes, I think given the variety
>> of possible exigent circumstances, it is best to leave this open and up to
>> the elected NCSG EC.
>>
>> Avri
>>
>> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Nadira Alaraj <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: 2/19/17 14:29 (GMT+00:00)
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Call for volunteers: alternate councillor
>>
>> Thanks Tapani,
>> I would like to share my observation about email threads, that gets too
>> much responses when it comes to leadership positions. Not only in the NCUC,
>> but in many ICANN working groups.  I think it is due to lack of any
>> procedures for such cases.
>>
>> I take this opportunity, to call upon the task-force whom they are
>> working on NCUC procedures, to consider this case.
>>
>> As for my opinion on the alternate councillor and since it is a short
>> period, it could be divided among Avri and Martin. So one will resume
>> during the period of ICANN 58 and soon to be switched to another for ICANN
>> 59.
>>
>> I think this will be a compromise solution since there are not written
>> rules.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Nadira ALARAJ
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> As Amr Elsadr resigned from the council upon joining the staff, the
>>> NCSG Executive Committee needs to appoint a temporary alternate to
>>> replace him.
>>>
>>> If you are interested in the job, please let me know as soon as
>>> possible, but no later than Wednesday February 22 (one week from now).
>>> The appointment is on the agenda of EC meeting on February 24, and we'd
>>> want to have list of names at least two days in advance so we'll have
>>> time to review them.
>>>
>>> Please explain why you think you'd be good for the task and confirm
>>> you could commit to the time it takes. Jumping in to the council
>>> mid-term is not easy, so experience is one key criteria for the EC in
>>> considering the appointment.
>>>
>>> The term extends until ICANN60 in the fall in Abu Dhabi, although the
>>> appointment can be made for a shorter time if the EC so chooses.
>>> If this makes a difference for you, for example if you'd only be able
>>> to do shorter time, or if you would not be interested in a shorter
>>> appointment, let us know that, too.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tapani Tarvainen
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2