Of course I mean 6 September.
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-review-15jul13-en.htm
avri
Ps.. I really wish the email system for this group was able to accept more than one address for a sender.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Syracuse University LISTSERV Server (16.0)" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> Date: 5 September 2013 07:49:51 EDT
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> You are not authorized to send mail to the NCSG-DISCUSS list from your
> [log in to unmask] account. You might be authorized to post to the list from another
> account, or perhaps when using another mail program configured to use a
> different email address. However, LISTSERV has no way to associate this other
> account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you have any
> questions regarding the policy of the NCSG-DISCUSS list, please contact the
> list owners at [log in to unmask]
>
> From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Reply period closing on Delay of GNSO review decsion
> Date: 5 September 2013 07:49:44 EDT
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> Of course I mean 6 September.
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-review-15jul13-en.htm
>
> avri
>
> On 5 Sep 2013, at 00:42, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.
>>
>> What do people think about the following?
>>
>> I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
>>
>> Please comment.
>> Any objections?
>> Any edits?
>>
>> -----
>>
>>
>> NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
>>
>> The NCSG also support comments submitted by:
>>
>> - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
>> - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
>>
>> against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
>>
>> The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
>>
>> We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.
>>
>> so please say something
>>
>> avri
>>
>
>
>