This is a good letter. I find myself largely in agreement with the Contracted Parties House here, especially in regards to principles 7 (primacy of Policy Development Processes) and 8 (strengthening community feedback processes). It will be interesting to see how ICANN responds.

- Ayden




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Letter from the Registries and Registrars on Staff Accountability
Local Time: 2 March 2017 7:26 PM
UTC Time: 2 March 2017 19:26
From: [log in to unmask]
To: CCWG Accountability <[log in to unmask]>



[All,]





I sent this to the Staff Accountability WS2 group, but thought that I would share with the broader community. We expect this letter to be posted on ICANN’s Correspondence page at some point soon.





Jeffrey J. Neuman


Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA


1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600


Mclean, VA 22102, United States


E: [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask]


T: +1.703.635.7514


M: +1.202.549.5079


@Jintlaw











From: Jeff Neuman
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Letter from the Registries and Registrars on Staff Accountability







All,





Please find enclosed a letter from the Registries and Registrars that relate to our work.





Best regards,





Jeffrey J. Neuman


Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA


1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600


Mclean, VA 22102, United States


E: [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask]


T: +1.703.635.7514


M: +1.202.549.5079


@Jintlaw