Niels,



I can’t read your response. Could you paste it into an e-mail?



In terms of the ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors, my only comment is that there is no explicit consequence listed, e.g. violation of these standards will result in a probationary period and a second violation will lead ICANN to deny in person registration/participation to ICANN meetings.



Best,



Brett





________________________________

Brett Schaefer

Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs

Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy

The Heritage Foundation

214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE

Washington, DC 20002

202-608-6097

heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>

From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever

Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 6:01 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors



It might not have been totally clear, but I would like to discuss this

as being an NCSG statement.



Best,



Niels



On 05/31/2016 09:27 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:

> Dear all,

>

> I hope this email finds you all well. As you might have seen, the public

> comments to the Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors have

> been opened.

>

> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/expected-standards-revisions-2016-05-16-en<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/expected-standards-revisions-2016-05-16-en>

>

> I have drafted an initial response here:

>

> https://pad.riseup.net/p/icannharassment<https://pad.riseup.net/p/icannharassment>

>

> Looking forward to discuss.

>

> Best,

>

> Niels

>



--

Niels ten Oever

Head of Digital



Article 19

www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org>



PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4

678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9