Monika,

I am just raising a question about process here. The ICANN Working Group 
process has a very specific formula for chartering and creation. Ad hoc 
groupings around issues (here human rights) are differentiated as 
Working Parties. All I am suggesting is that labels be kept distinct so 
that there is not confusion among the ICANN crowd, and outside the ICANN 
crowd. How that is done for the parts of a Working Party should be in 
ways that also minimize confusion. As you well know in law, words in 
formal processes have precise meanings.

On 2016-04-07 6:55 AM, Zalnieriute, Monika wrote:
>
> Sam,
>
>
> are You suggesting we cal the Research sub-group of the CCWP a sub-party?
>
>
> ----
>
> Dr. Monika Zalnieriute
>
> Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I
>
> Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I 
> cmds.ceu.edu I
>
> Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I 
> icann.org I
>
> Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I 
> zephiroplatform.org I
>
> Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I 
> cihr.eu I
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of 
> Zalnieriute, Monika <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2016 10:50 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [cc-humanrights-research] [cc-humanrights] CCWP-HR 
> Research: Call for volunteers (reply by 8th April) + Call Update
>
> I would say that the 'indivisibility' is a relative concept, just like 
> human rights&#X1f60a
>
>
> ----
>
> Dr. Monika Zalnieriute
>
>
> Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I
>
> Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I 
> cmds.ceu.edu I
>
> Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I 
> icann.org I
>
> Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I 
> zephiroplatform.org I
>
> Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I 
> cihr.eu I
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Sam 
> Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2016 10:40 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [cc-humanrights-research] [cc-humanrights] CCWP-HR 
> Research: Call for volunteers (reply by 8th April) + Call Update
> All,
>
> I hate to be the pedantic one here but as I understand this ccWP, it 
> is a bottom up initiative among ICANN participants. It has no ICANN 
> chartering process, etc. and hence carries the ad hoc Working Party 
> (WP) label. It is not a formal ICANN Working Group (WG).
>
> I hope I am correct in asking that all communications use proper 
> identifiers, and call it a Working Party, and not a group, or there 
> may be unnecessary and troublesome confusion both inside ICANN and 
> outside ICANN.
>
> Sam Lanfranco, NPOC
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
     [Rest deleted]