Shouldn't the ISP constituency be involved in this discussion?

From the application documents, looks like they are trying to create an
association, rather than being an already established group.

Perhaps as a member of NPOC rather than a new constituency?

Adam



On Thursday, October 11, 2012, Marc Perkel wrote:

> I agree - Non-Commercial means non-commercial. So the for profit can go
> somewhere else.
>
> On 10/10/2012 8:42 PM, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
>
>> ICANN's Silo model indeed produces a problem for this group. I think what
>> they really need to do is split themselves for the purposes of ICANN
>> formal
>> structures into two groups: "non-profit Public Internet Access" and
>> "Cyber-cafes and other commercial shared computer access providers", apply
>> for NCSG/CSG group membership but agree amongst themselves that they will
>> coordinate strongly between them on promoting the clear common interests
>> such
>> a group has.
>>
>> I'm afraid I could not support the inclusion of for-profit access
>> providers
>> in an NCSG constituency as it violates the non-commercial principle of SG
>> membership.
>>
>>