What about my implanted medical devices (fortunately numbering 0 at the 
moment....):-)
SP
On 2015-03-27 8:54, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> Seun & Stephanie,
>
> You will not have to add a domain name to your vehicle for it to be 
> accessed. Your vehicle will have an Internet identity independent of 
> anything you do. Mobil devices, e.g. cell phones, have unique mobile 
> identification numbers (MIN), and so will your car. Vehicles have 
> in-car diagnostic networks, and increasingly come with standard 
> factory installed features that use cell technology to link to the 
> Internet. The data privacy issues here are the same as in other areas. 
> Who owns the data? Who has access to it? -and- What is it used for?
>
> Sam L
>
> On 27/03/2015 4:28 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephanie,
>>
>> Replying to your question (re: who owns domain of your car), first I 
>> like to say there is practically no way your Honda will be accessible 
>> by domain without the domain being added in the first place so you 
>> will be making an informed decision by adding the domain. However if 
>> there arise a technology that hard-codes domain on your Honda, you 
>> will also need to make decision to connect device on the network with 
>> an IP address before the domain can be reachable publicly.
>> So the question would be, how informed will users be by then. I don't 
>> really think domain registration would be a big concern by then.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>> On 27 Mar 2015 06:47, "Stephanie Perrin" 
>> <[log in to unmask] 
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>>     I certainly am.  I am curious to know whether domains are going
>>     to be involved, and if so who will register them (i.e. will
>>     Steph's Honda, and all the tattle tale devices in it be
>>     accessible on a domain, and if so who owns the domain....Honda,
>>     my insurance company, the device companies, the apps, or me???)
>>     SP
>>
>>     On 2015-03-27 0:37, James Gannon wrote:
>>
>>         I do some work and research in this area, if someone reminds
>>         me next week after Im back from the CWG F2F i can do up some
>>         info on this for the group if anyone is interested?
>>
>>         On 27 Mar 2015, at 02:59, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]
>>         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>>             Stephanie,
>>
>>             This has been on the agenda and worried about for some
>>             time. The "connected-car" is but one data source in the
>>             Internet of Things (IoT). Everything written in this
>>             piece will apply to your IoT stove, frig, children's
>>             coat, garage door, furnace, light switch....you name it.
>>             One approach is to say all data is privately owned and
>>             that the data miners have to negotiate for what they have
>>             access to within the privately owned data.
>>
>>             Sam L.
>>
>>
>>             On 26/03/2015 4:59 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>
>>                 Folks interested in privacy may find this report on
>>                 the connected car interesting, if alarming.  The
>>                 report was written by Philippa Lawson, a well known
>>                 Canadian privacy lawyer who was for several years
>>                 heading up CIPPIC in Ottawa.  This privacy research
>>                 was funded under the Canadian Privacy Commissioner's
>>                 grants and contributions program.
>>                 https://fipa.bc.ca/connected-car/
>>                 Stephanie Perrin
>>
>>
>>             -
>>
>